Some low quality presentation in Q and A tonight. Here it is
Gigi was trying to talk, and the other guys kept putting words in her mouth. What kind of fair question is, "Why do you want people to die?"
It's clear she's trying to describe some trade-off between two evils. If the host was trying to be objective and fair minded, he needed to stop accusing her of being evil and let her explain the other side of the trade-off.
The continuous interruptions of Gigi's explanation, meant that it ended up vague and low-fidelity. The substance of her argument is railroaded into impossible to validate claims like, "I don't want people to die", and only a vague explanation that perhaps lock-downs cause more net suffering and death than the Covid deaths.
Perhaps that was the entirety of her argument? Maybe she doesn't have stronger content, analysis or forecasts to put forward than her vague "I reckon". If this is the case I could never endorse her.
But the show host kept up a barrage of attacks on her so she couldn't speak, so I'll guess we will never know.